Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons

John Woods and Brent Hudak’s theory on arguments by analogy (1989), although correct in its meta-argumentative approach, gives rise to problems when we consider the possibility of weighing reasons. I contend that this is an outcome construing relationship between premises conclusion compared argumentation as inferences. An interpretation terms reasons proposed here. The reasons-based approach solves these allows be extended account for a particular variant which subjects comparison are not arguments, but weighings